tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.comments2023-04-13T03:57:25.135-06:00Kimberlie Ryan's Hot Button ForumKim Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13602661330696706333noreply@blogger.comBlogger23125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-52185557649893841582013-02-28T16:04:24.901-07:002013-02-28T16:04:24.901-07:00Well I can tell you they still dont provide their ...Well I can tell you they still dont provide their managers with training nor and as far as I know i never seen a notice about the lawsuit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-41920283590664095382011-06-27T22:30:24.728-06:002011-06-27T22:30:24.728-06:00I have read a few good stuff here. Certainly worth...I have read a few good stuff here. Certainly worth bookmarking for revisiting. I wonder how much effort you put to create such a fantastic informative site.<br /><a href="http://www.discountacparts.com/1991/Toyota/Celica/A-C_Compressor.html" rel="nofollow">1991 Toyota Celica AC Compressor </a>aishahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08527345097741411358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-30051222582126116552010-12-24T18:45:17.756-07:002010-12-24T18:45:17.756-07:00sad. good interview though, you go girl! thanks fo...sad. good interview though, you go girl! thanks for doing what you do!<br /><br />From a divorce court ruling in Arapahoe County by Magistrate Fliss:<br /><br />"The Court is concerned even though Mr. Xxxxxxx states he has a medical marijuana card, he did acknowledge that he had previously smoked marijuana years ago when it was obviously illegal. Respondent is also in the music industry, and while the Court does not hold any prejudices to that, the Court does note that that is an industry in which the use of drugs is more persistent or more used than in other professions."<br /><br /><br />I've played guitar for 35 years, the last 21 of which have been clean and sober! got med mar card for debilitating back pain in 2010.<br />is she saying because I smoked weed over 21 years ago illegally that my med card is suspect?<br /><br />the music industry is worse than the:<br />bar and restaurant, ski, construction, painting, roofing industries?<br /><br />does this seem right?Russhttp://www.gruckee.com/home/blognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-1648484895915588162010-07-27T22:24:55.256-06:002010-07-27T22:24:55.256-06:00I'm with you all the way. I made the choice to...I'm with you all the way. I made the choice to use Medical Marijuana for my RLS instead of the other medication after seeing what the side effects had done to my mother when she used them for her RLS. I got my recommendation back in March after moving to Colorado. Since then I have not been able to get a job because of my choice. Something needs to change. We are being dicriminated against. Are we not allowed to feed,cloth and shelter our children and ourselves anymore, are we not allowed to contribute to our county and keep it strong by paying our income taxs anymore? You are so right for this post. What can we do to end this discrimination.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-72698616298843528352010-06-19T09:23:08.261-06:002010-06-19T09:23:08.261-06:00I recently came across your blog and have been rea...I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.<br /><a href="http://www.greenflashmedical.com/" rel="nofollow">marijuana dispensary san diego</a>Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02967251681948421484noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-55371049954171056192010-04-07T12:04:57.621-06:002010-04-07T12:04:57.621-06:00Unfortunately, the known FLAW in the FTC Rule gove...Unfortunately, the known FLAW in the FTC Rule governing the sale of franchises to the public does encourage franchisers and their attorneys to sell unprofitable and economically unviable franchises to the public under cover of the FTC Rule and state FDD's. <br /><br />Lets hope that the Remand of the Case on Feb 18th by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals will ultimately expose the flaw and the limitations of the FTC Rule as to protection of prospective franchisees.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-74691563769705250432010-03-12T15:24:24.026-07:002010-03-12T15:24:24.026-07:00The opinion on the Appeal was posted on the websit...The opinion on the Appeal was posted on the website of the Colorado Court of Appeals, Court of Appeals No. 09CA0130, on February 18th, 2010. It is interesting reading -- even for lay people, and especially for the plaintiff franchisees. <br /><br />While the Judgement was affirmed in part, vacated in part, and the case was remanded with directions, perhaps a door has been opened to discuss what might constitute common law fraud over and above what is required to be disclosed under the provisions of the ineffective and inadequate FTC Rule and the FDD's that govern disclosure in the sale of franchises. <br /><br />Hopefully, there will be justice for the plaintiffs. It is not over until the fat lady sings and no matter what the District Court again decides, any party can appeal. Perhaps this will act to settle the matter because those in and around franchising who like the ineffective FTC Rule may not want to make new case law in the courts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-88138717022298523392009-09-22T18:40:05.349-06:002009-09-22T18:40:05.349-06:00$35 dollars$35 dollarsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-27372341247564722942009-09-04T15:12:27.791-06:002009-09-04T15:12:27.791-06:00Not a damn thing. These are just allegations. Is...Not a damn thing. These are just allegations. Is that all it takes nowadays, just accuse someone? Guilty until proven innocent?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-79870224790969319292009-08-13T19:12:32.742-06:002009-08-13T19:12:32.742-06:00half a milhalf a milAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-89618713932888525352009-05-22T23:55:46.603-06:002009-05-22T23:55:46.603-06:00Thanks, Tania!Thanks, Tania!Kim Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13602661330696706333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-45640114230094988642009-05-22T16:59:58.107-06:002009-05-22T16:59:58.107-06:00More on both sides here:
http://unemploymentality...More on both sides here:<br /><br />http://unemploymentality.com/2009/05/fired-for-not-wearing-makeup/Taniahttp://www.unemploymentality.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-37870645661167644002009-05-22T16:58:19.521-06:002009-05-22T16:58:19.521-06:00I understand that her dismissal was unfair, but I ...I understand that her dismissal was unfair, but I don't see that there is any sexual discrimination here. <br /><br />Men have to shave their faces. Women don't. Men aren't allowed (normally) to have facial jewelry or earrings. (I've worked in places where they forced them to take them off, while I had a nose piercing) And what if a man wanted to wear makeup? Would he be allowed to? I doubt it. <br /><br />The fact of the matter is, there are different standards in terms of appearance for men and women. We both have to do annoying things to be presentable, but they are obviously not always going to be the same things. <br /><br />If she's going to claim sexual discrimination, the men should too for having to shave their face.Taniahttp://www.unemploymentality.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-917787193794961502009-05-01T11:27:00.000-06:002009-05-01T11:27:00.000-06:00Observe Law Day by enforcing these statutes:
Unit...Observe Law Day by enforcing these statutes:<br /><br />United States Code, Title 18, 2441: War Crimes<br />United States Code, Title 18, 2340A: Torture<br /><br />See:<br /><br />http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/may-1-2009-law-day/Mike Lichthttp://notionscapital.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-54377319204207858862009-03-19T08:34:00.000-06:002009-03-19T08:34:00.000-06:00Hervy, thanks for your post! You are not alone, a...Hervy, thanks for your post! You are not alone, and I find myself doing the same things. Since the work never seems to end, I find that it's important to disconnect from the computer and phones every once in a while and go outside to a park - even if just for a few minutes a day! We'd love to see your website, if you want to post the link. Safe travels to you in your journeys!Kim Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13602661330696706333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-71514174322629846592009-03-19T00:47:00.000-06:002009-03-19T00:47:00.000-06:00I probably am a workaholic. Well, I don't know if...I probably am a workaholic. Well, I don't know if I am actually driving by wanting to do too much or what. It's not like I don't know that spending more time spread among different task will likely water down the completeness of each task. I warm people all the time not to over commit. Yet I continuously find myself with too much to do. I don't know does that qualify as being a workaholic.<BR/><BR/>I should be working on my website right now, but I am off in la la land commenting on being a workaholic.<BR/><BR/>What am I going to do with me?<BR/><BR/>I think I do things to get a break from doing other things. I work all day (driving a truck). After I get finished driving then I work on my website about driving a truck. Then when I get home I work on editing video from driving and about driving a truck. <BR/><BR/>My friends tell me I need help. They say when I get home I am supposed to stop working. I say I am just paying my dues now so that I can relax a little later.<BR/><BR/>Maybe I will find a healthy balance very soon. The sad thing is none of these task has a finish point. Everything is ongoing and could last til infinity. That's really not so good!<BR/><BR/>Thinks for the space to vent. lol<BR/>Hervy<BR/><BR/>Very Nice Blogspot by the way!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-62192573399959006922009-03-05T11:55:00.000-07:002009-03-05T11:55:00.000-07:00You are very perceptive, but the law actually prov...You are very perceptive, but the law actually provides the tax credit to the EMPLOYER. It seems backwards, but the way the law works is that the ARRA treats assistance eligible individuals who pay 35 percent of their COBRA premium as having paid the full amount. The premium reduction (65 percent of the full premium) is reimbursable to the employer, insurer or health plan as a credit against certain employment taxes. If the credit amount is greater than the taxes due, the Secretary of the Treasury will directly reimburse the employer, insurer or plan for the excess. See the Department of Labor's Fact Sheet at: http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/fsCOBRApremiumreduction.html. Thanks for your comment!!Kim Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13602661330696706333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-61703528272363172332009-03-05T10:48:00.000-07:002009-03-05T10:48:00.000-07:00You indicate the tax credit is to the former EMPLO...You indicate the tax credit is to the former EMPLOYER - shouldn't that be EMPLOYEE?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-91837017486012309702009-02-28T03:41:00.000-07:002009-02-28T03:41:00.000-07:00Thank you so much for this wonderful write-up on S...Thank you so much for this wonderful write-up on Solo Practice University. You know it's a labor of love and a herculean effort but there are so many lawyers out there wishing they had a place to call home where they can learn how to actually be a solo practitioner...something never taught in law school.<BR/><BR/>I hope you'll come by to visit soon!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-36234480631378857032008-09-25T19:41:00.000-06:002008-09-25T19:41:00.000-06:00I don't believe this provision would give employee...I don't believe this provision would give employees a new right of action in a mass lay off situation. In general, a lay off is different from a termination. Sometimes lay offs are governed by federal law, such as the WARN Act, which generally requires 60 days' notice in case of a mass layoff for covered employers. Usually business considerations can provide "just cause" to support a termination - if that's the true reason for the firing.Kim Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13602661330696706333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-70037455554409679912008-09-25T18:59:00.000-06:002008-09-25T18:59:00.000-06:00Thanks very much for the kind words, Kim! And for ...Thanks very much for the kind words, Kim! And for mentioning the mindfulness classes. A great service Duke and eMindful.com are providing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-51273281105761279432008-09-25T16:20:00.000-06:002008-09-25T16:20:00.000-06:00One thing that I am unclear on:For example, if a c...One thing that I am unclear on:<BR/><BR/>For example, if a company decides to RIF a group of employees to shift the work to another state or country, if this passes, the RIF'd employee would have legal recourse?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10961850.post-55618857159859068232008-09-22T14:27:00.000-06:002008-09-22T14:27:00.000-06:00You even agree with Michelle Malkin:http://michell...You even agree with Michelle Malkin:<BR/><BR/>http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/22/why-henry-paulson-must-be-contained/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com